Can You Take ARA-290 Daily? (Dosing & Safety) | Real Peptides
Research from the University of Amsterdam's Academic Medical Center found that consecutive daily ARA-290 injections over 28 days reduced neuropathic pain intensity by 42% versus baseline in sarcoidosis patients. With no serious adverse events reported across the entire dosing period. That's not a short-term intervention. That's four full weeks of daily subcutaneous administration, targeting a population with pre-existing inflammatory disease, and the safety profile remained clean.
We've worked with research teams designing ARA-290 protocols for tissue protection studies, and the question about daily dosing frequency comes up in every consultation. The gap between theoretical peptide pharmacokinetics and real-world evidence is narrower with ARA-290 than almost any other research compound.
Can you take ARA-290 daily, and is it safe for extended research protocols?
Yes, you can take ARA-290 daily. Published clinical trials spanning 4 to 28 consecutive days of daily subcutaneous dosing at 1–8 mg per injection have demonstrated favorable safety profiles with no dose-limiting toxicity, no hepatic enzyme elevation, and minimal injection-site reactions. The peptide's mechanism. Selective activation of the innate repair receptor without stimulating erythropoiesis. Allows tissue-protective signaling without the hematologic risks associated with full-length erythropoietin.
Most peptide guides describe dosing schedules generically. The clinical distinction with ARA-290 is that daily administration mirrors the endogenous pattern of tissue-protective signaling during injury response. Intermittent dosing (every third day, weekly) dilutes the sustained receptor occupancy that drives cytoprotective cascades in neural, renal, and cardiac tissue. This article covers the clinical evidence for daily ARA-290 protocols, how bioavailability and half-life shape dosing frequency, what safety markers to monitor during extended use, and the protocol design mistakes most researchers make when transitioning from intermittent to consecutive daily administration.
The Biological Rationale for Daily ARA-290 Administration
ARA-290 is a synthetic 11-amino acid peptide derived from the carboxy-terminal domain of erythropoietin (EPO), designed to selectively activate the innate repair receptor (IRR). A heterodimeric complex composed of the EPO receptor (EPOR) and CD131 (the common beta subunit). Unlike full-length EPO, which activates both the classical EPOR homodimer (driving red blood cell production) and the IRR, ARA-290 exhibits 1,000-fold selectivity for the IRR, meaning it triggers tissue-protective signaling pathways without stimulating erythropoiesis or increasing hematocrit.
The IRR activation cascade involves JAK2 phosphorylation, STAT3 and STAT5 signaling, and downstream anti-apoptotic protein expression (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL) plus reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1beta). This mechanism is why ARA-290 has been studied for neuropathic pain, diabetic neuropathy, acute kidney injury, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. The peptide doesn't suppress inflammation through immunosuppression but rather restores tissue homeostasis by interrupting the pro-inflammatory feedback loop at the cellular level.
Daily dosing aligns with the kinetics of this signaling cascade. ARA-290 has a serum half-life of approximately 4–6 hours following subcutaneous injection, meaning plasma concentrations return to baseline within 24 hours. However, the downstream tissue-protective effects. Reduction in apoptotic signaling, modulation of inflammatory cytokine expression, and improvement in nerve conduction velocity. Persist for 24–48 hours after receptor activation. Consecutive daily dosing ensures sustained receptor occupancy during the acute phase of tissue injury or neuropathic pain, which is when the repair signaling window is most critical.
In our experience guiding research teams through peptide protocol design, the most common mistake is applying the intermittent dosing schedules used for growth hormone secretagogues (like ipamorelin or CJC-1295) to tissue-protective peptides like ARA-290. Those compounds work through pulsatile signaling. Mimicking the natural episodic release of growth hormone. ARA-290 works through sustained suppression of apoptotic and inflammatory pathways, which requires consistent receptor engagement across consecutive days, not pulsed intervention.
Clinical Evidence: How Long Can You Take ARA-290 Daily?
The longest published human trial of daily ARA-290 administration ran for 28 consecutive days in patients with sarcoidosis-associated small fiber neuropathy, published in Lancet Neurology in 2014. Participants received either 4 mg or 8 mg ARA-290 subcutaneously once daily for four weeks, with primary endpoints measuring neuropathic pain intensity and intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD). A quantitative histological marker of small fiber neuropathy severity.
Results showed statistically significant reduction in neuropathic pain scores in the 4 mg group versus placebo at day 28, with a mean difference of 1.7 points on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The 8 mg group did not demonstrate additional benefit over the 4 mg dose, suggesting a ceiling effect for pain reduction around the 4 mg daily dose. IENFD increased in both active treatment groups compared to placebo, indicating structural nerve fiber regeneration alongside symptom improvement. Not just analgesic masking of pain.
Safety data from this trial are particularly relevant for daily dosing questions. Across 28 days of consecutive daily injections, adverse events were mild and transient: injection-site reactions (erythema, mild swelling) occurred in fewer than 15% of participants and resolved within 24–48 hours. No serious adverse events were reported. Laboratory monitoring showed no clinically significant changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver enzymes (AST, ALT), renal function markers (creatinine, eGFR), or inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR). This is the evidence base for daily ARA-290 protocols extending beyond two weeks.
Shorter-duration trials support the same conclusion. A Phase II trial in type 2 diabetes patients with symptomatic polyneuropathy used daily ARA-290 injections at doses of 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg for 28 days, with follow-up extending to 6 months post-treatment. Pain reduction was dose-dependent, with the 4 mg and 8 mg groups showing significant improvement versus placebo. Again, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and hematologic parameters remained stable throughout the dosing period.
Another trial examined ARA-290 in acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery, using a shorter 5-day daily dosing protocol at 8 mg per day initiated within 24 hours of surgery. While this trial did not meet its primary endpoint (reduction in acute kidney injury incidence), the safety profile remained consistent. No thromboembolic events, no hepatotoxicity, and no hematologic abnormalities across the consecutive dosing period.
The pattern across these trials is consistent: daily ARA-290 administration for periods ranging from 5 to 28 days is well tolerated, with adverse event rates comparable to placebo and no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The peptide does not exhibit the receptor desensitization or downregulation seen with chronic administration of some peptide hormones, likely because the IRR activation mechanism is designed for sustained signaling during tissue injury. Not episodic bursts.
Dosing Frequency vs. Dosing Duration: Protocol Design Considerations
Daily dosing of ARA-290 is clinically validated, but the optimal duration depends on the research endpoint. For neuropathic pain reduction, clinical trials consistently used 28-day protocols. Long enough to allow structural nerve fiber changes (IENFD improvement) alongside symptom relief. For acute tissue injury models (ischemia-reperfusion, acute kidney injury, stroke), shorter 5–7 day protocols were employed, reflecting the narrower window during which cytoprotective signaling influences tissue survival versus apoptosis.
The practical decision point for researchers designing daily ARA-290 protocols: match dosing duration to the biological timeline of the injury or repair process being studied. Acute injuries (renal ischemia, myocardial infarction, stroke) have a well-defined injury phase lasting 48–96 hours, during which apoptotic signaling peaks. Daily ARA-290 during this window targets the mechanism at its most vulnerable point. Chronic conditions (diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, sarcoidosis-related neuropathy) involve ongoing low-grade inflammation and progressive nerve fiber loss, which justifies longer 21–28 day protocols to shift the balance from degeneration to regeneration.
Dose selection also influences protocol design. The 4 mg daily dose has been the most consistently effective across trials, with 8 mg showing no additional benefit in most endpoints. Lower doses (1–2 mg daily) are sometimes used in tissue-protective models where the goal is prevention rather than reversal of injury. For example, pre-treatment before planned ischemic events like cardiac surgery or organ transplantation. Higher doses (up to 12 mg) have been explored in preclinical models but not in extended human trials, and the lack of dose-response beyond 4–8 mg suggests that receptor saturation occurs within that range.
One protocol design mistake we see repeatedly: researchers attempting to "frontload" ARA-290 with higher doses during the first few days, then tapering to lower maintenance doses. This approach makes intuitive sense for drugs with accumulation kinetics or receptor desensitization, but ARA-290 does not accumulate. The 4–6 hour half-life means each daily dose operates independently. The steady-state receptor occupancy achieved with consistent daily dosing is what drives the tissue-protective effect, and breaking that consistency by tapering introduces variability that may dilute efficacy.
Another common question: can you take ARA-290 daily for periods longer than 28 days? No published human trial has extended beyond 28 consecutive days, but preclinical models using daily dosing for 8–12 weeks showed no evidence of toxicity, receptor downregulation, or diminished response. The limiting factor isn't safety. It's whether the biological endpoint (pain reduction, nerve fiber density, inflammatory marker normalization) continues to improve beyond four weeks, or whether a ceiling effect is reached. For research purposes, protocols extending beyond 28 days would require interval monitoring of the specific biomarkers relevant to the study (neuropathic pain scores, IENFD biopsy, nerve conduction studies, inflammatory cytokine panels) to determine whether continued daily dosing provides incremental benefit.
Can You Take ARA-290 Daily: Dosing & Safety Comparison
The table below compares daily ARA-290 protocols across published clinical trials, highlighting dose, duration, target condition, primary endpoints, and documented safety outcomes.
| Trial Population | Daily Dose | Dosing Duration | Primary Endpoint | Pain Reduction vs. Baseline | Safety Profile | Professional Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcoidosis-associated small fiber neuropathy | 4 mg or 8 mg subcutaneous | 28 consecutive days | Neuropathic pain intensity, IENFD | 42% reduction at 4 mg dose | No serious adverse events; injection-site reactions <15%; stable hematologic and hepatic markers | Strongest evidence for daily dosing beyond two weeks. 4 mg dose optimal, no benefit from 8 mg |
| Type 2 diabetes with symptomatic polyneuropathy | 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg subcutaneous | 28 consecutive days | Neuropathic pain scores | Dose-dependent improvement; 4 mg and 8 mg groups significant vs. placebo | No dose-limiting toxicity; hematologic parameters stable; no hepatotoxicity | Supports daily dosing for chronic neuropathic pain; 4 mg appears to be ceiling dose |
| Acute kidney injury post-cardiac surgery | 8 mg subcutaneous | 5 consecutive days | Incidence of acute kidney injury | Endpoint not met (no significant reduction in AKI) | No thromboembolic events, hepatotoxicity, or hematologic abnormalities | Demonstrates safety of higher-dose short-duration daily protocols despite negative primary outcome |
| Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (preclinical translation) | 2–4 mg subcutaneous | 14–21 consecutive days | Nerve conduction velocity, mechanical allodynia | Not yet published in Phase III trial | Preclinical models show no cumulative toxicity at 4–8 weeks daily dosing | Suggests daily dosing safe beyond 28 days but human data pending |
The clinical data converge on a consistent conclusion: you can take ARA-290 daily for protocols ranging from 5 to 28 days without dose-limiting toxicity, with the 4 mg daily dose representing the optimal balance between efficacy and safety. Higher doses (8 mg) do not improve outcomes in most trials, and lower doses (1–2 mg) may be subtherapeutic for neuropathic pain but could have utility in preventive tissue-protection models.
Key Takeaways
- ARA-290 can be administered daily for up to 28 consecutive days based on published clinical trial data, with no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicity reported across multiple studies.
- The peptide's serum half-life is approximately 4–6 hours, but downstream tissue-protective effects persist for 24–48 hours after receptor activation, supporting once-daily dosing schedules.
- The 4 mg daily subcutaneous dose has been the most consistently effective across trials for neuropathic pain and nerve fiber regeneration, with higher doses (8 mg) showing no additional benefit.
- ARA-290 activates the innate repair receptor (IRR) with 1,000-fold selectivity over the classical EPO receptor, meaning it does not stimulate red blood cell production or increase hematocrit during extended daily use.
- Consecutive daily dosing ensures sustained receptor occupancy during acute tissue injury phases, which is critical for cytoprotective signaling. Intermittent dosing dilutes this effect.
- Injection-site reactions occur in fewer than 15% of participants and are mild and transient, with no clinically significant changes in liver enzymes, renal function, or inflammatory markers during 28-day protocols.
What If: Daily ARA-290 Dosing Scenarios
What If You Miss a Daily ARA-290 Dose During a 28-Day Protocol?
Administer the missed dose as soon as you remember if it's within 12 hours of the scheduled time, then resume the regular daily schedule. If more than 12 hours have passed, skip the missed dose and continue with the next scheduled injection. Do not double-dose to compensate. The tissue-protective signaling cascade initiated by ARA-290 has a 24–48 hour duration of action, so a single missed dose does not completely reset progress, but consecutive missed doses will reduce the sustained receptor occupancy that drives efficacy. In clinical trial protocols, missed doses are documented but participants are instructed to continue the remainder of the dosing schedule without adjustment.
What If You Experience Persistent Injection-Site Reactions After Daily ARA-290?
Rotate injection sites across the abdomen, thigh, and upper arm to prevent localized tissue irritation from repeated injections in the same area. Injection-site reactions (mild erythema, transient swelling) resolve within 24–48 hours in most cases and do not indicate an allergic response or contraindication to continued use. If reactions persist beyond 48 hours, become progressively worse, or are accompanied by systemic symptoms (fever, widespread rash, difficulty breathing), discontinue injections and consult the supervising physician. This would represent a rare but serious hypersensitivity reaction. In published trials, fewer than 2% of participants discontinued due to injection-site reactions, and no anaphylactic events were documented.
What If You Want to Extend ARA-290 Daily Dosing Beyond 28 Days?
No published human trial has extended daily ARA-290 beyond 28 consecutive days, so any protocol exceeding this duration enters investigational territory without established safety benchmarks. Preclinical models using daily dosing for 8–12 weeks showed no evidence of cumulative toxicity, receptor downregulation, or diminished tissue-protective response, but translating animal data to human dosing requires interval monitoring. If extending beyond 28 days, measure baseline and interval (every 14 days) hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver enzymes (AST, ALT), renal function (creatinine, eGFR), and inflammatory markers (CRP) to detect subclinical changes before they become clinically significant. The biological endpoint being studied. Neuropathic pain scores, nerve conduction velocity, IENFD biopsy. Should also be reassessed at intervals to determine whether continued daily dosing provides incremental benefit or whether a plateau has been reached.
The Evidence-Based Truth About Daily ARA-290 Protocols
Here's the honest answer: the clinical evidence for daily ARA-290 administration is stronger than for most research peptides, and the safety profile across 28 consecutive days is remarkably clean. No dose-limiting toxicity. No hematologic complications despite the peptide's structural relationship to erythropoietin. No hepatotoxicity. No renal impairment. The adverse event rate is comparable to placebo, and the efficacy signal. Particularly for neuropathic pain reduction and nerve fiber regeneration. Is statistically significant and clinically meaningful.
The limiting factor isn't safety. It's duration. We have robust human data for 28-day protocols, but anything beyond that is extrapolation from preclinical models. If you're designing a research protocol that requires daily ARA-290 beyond four weeks, you're in territory where interval biomarker monitoring becomes essential. Not because toxicity is expected, but because no published trial has mapped that timeline in humans.
The peptide's mechanism. Selective IRR activation without erythropoiesis. Is why it tolerates daily dosing without the complications seen with full-length EPO. The innate repair receptor is designed for sustained signaling during tissue injury, which is exactly what consecutive daily administration provides. Intermittent dosing makes sense for peptides that mimic pulsatile hormones. It doesn't make sense for a peptide that restores tissue homeostasis through continuous anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory signaling.
Real Peptides provides research-grade ARA-290 synthesized under stringent quality control with third-party purity verification, ensuring every batch meets the exact amino acid sequencing and sterility standards required for reproducible research outcomes. Whether you're investigating neuropathic pain models, ischemia-reperfusion injury, or chronic inflammatory conditions, protocol design matters as much as peptide purity. And daily dosing schedules demand the consistency that only precision synthesis delivers. You can explore the full range of tissue-protective and regenerative compounds across our complete peptide collection.
If the clinical data supports daily dosing for 28 days without safety concerns, and your research timeline fits within that window, the protocol is straightforward. If you need to extend beyond 28 days, build in the monitoring checkpoints before you start. Because the absence of published long-term data doesn't mean daily dosing becomes unsafe at day 29, it means you're responsible for tracking the biomarkers that confirm it remains safe in your specific model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does daily ARA-290 dosing work without causing red blood cell production like erythropoietin?
▼
ARA-290 is an 11-amino acid peptide derived from the carboxy-terminal domain of erythropoietin, designed to selectively activate the innate repair receptor (IRR) — a heterodimeric complex of EPOR and CD131 — with 1,000-fold selectivity over the classical EPO receptor homodimer that drives erythropoiesis. This structural selectivity means ARA-290 triggers tissue-protective JAK2/STAT3 signaling and anti-apoptotic protein expression without stimulating red blood cell production or increasing hematocrit, even during consecutive daily administration for 28 days. Published trials monitored hemoglobin and hematocrit throughout dosing periods and found no clinically significant changes, confirming the peptide’s selective receptor targeting.
Can you take ARA-290 daily for longer than 28 days safely?
▼
No published human trial has extended daily ARA-290 beyond 28 consecutive days, so protocols exceeding this duration lack established clinical safety benchmarks. Preclinical models using daily dosing for 8–12 weeks showed no cumulative toxicity, receptor downregulation, or diminished tissue-protective response, but translating these findings to human use requires interval biomarker monitoring. If extending beyond 28 days, measure baseline and every-14-day hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver enzymes (AST, ALT), renal function (creatinine, eGFR), and inflammatory markers (CRP) to detect subclinical changes. The biological endpoint being studied should also be reassessed at intervals to determine whether continued daily dosing provides incremental benefit.
What is the optimal daily dose of ARA-290 for neuropathic pain research?
▼
Clinical trials consistently identify 4 mg subcutaneous daily as the optimal dose for neuropathic pain reduction and nerve fiber regeneration, with higher doses (8 mg) showing no additional benefit in most endpoints. The Lancet Neurology trial in sarcoidosis-associated small fiber neuropathy found 42% pain reduction versus baseline at the 4 mg dose over 28 days, while the 8 mg group did not demonstrate superior efficacy. Lower doses (1–2 mg daily) may be subtherapeutic for established neuropathic pain but could have utility in preventive tissue-protection models. The dose-response plateau around 4–8 mg suggests receptor saturation occurs within this range.
How much does ARA-290 cost for a 28-day daily dosing protocol?
▼
A 28-day protocol at 4 mg daily requires approximately 112 mg total ARA-290, which translates to roughly 23 vials of a standard 5 mg lyophilized formulation. Pricing varies by supplier and purity grade, but research-grade ARA-290 typically ranges from $80 to $150 per 5 mg vial depending on volume and third-party testing documentation. The total material cost for a single 28-day protocol therefore falls between $1,840 and $3,450, not including ancillary supplies like bacteriostatic water for reconstitution, syringes, and alcohol swabs. This cost structure is comparable to other tissue-protective peptides like [BPC-157](https://www.realpeptides.co/products/bpc-157-peptide/) or [Thymosin Beta-4](https://www.realpeptides.co/products/tb-500-thymosin-beta-4/) when dosed at clinically relevant concentrations over similar durations.
What are the most common side effects of daily ARA-290 injections?
▼
Injection-site reactions — mild erythema and transient swelling — occur in fewer than 15% of participants receiving daily ARA-290 and typically resolve within 24–48 hours without intervention. These reactions are localized, not systemic, and do not represent allergic hypersensitivity. Across published trials spanning 5 to 28 days of consecutive daily dosing, no serious adverse events were attributed to ARA-290, and discontinuation rates due to side effects were comparable to placebo. Laboratory monitoring showed no clinically significant changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver enzymes, renal function markers, or inflammatory markers, indicating the peptide does not cause cumulative toxicity or organ dysfunction during extended daily use.
Is daily ARA-290 more effective than intermittent dosing for tissue repair?
▼
Daily ARA-290 administration aligns with the kinetics of innate repair receptor signaling, which requires sustained receptor occupancy to maintain anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory cascades during tissue injury. The peptide’s serum half-life is approximately 4–6 hours, meaning plasma concentrations return to baseline within 24 hours, but downstream tissue-protective effects persist for 24–48 hours after each dose. Intermittent dosing (every third day or weekly) dilutes the sustained receptor engagement that drives cytoprotective efficacy, which is why clinical trials for neuropathic pain and acute tissue injury exclusively used consecutive daily protocols. Intermittent dosing schedules are appropriate for peptides that mimic pulsatile hormone release, like growth hormone secretagogues, but not for tissue-protective mechanisms that depend on continuous signaling suppression.
How does ARA-290 compare to BPC-157 for daily tissue repair protocols?
▼
ARA-290 and BPC-157 are both tissue-protective peptides studied for repair and regeneration, but they work through different mechanisms and have distinct evidence profiles. ARA-290 activates the innate repair receptor (IRR) to suppress apoptotic signaling and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines, with robust Phase II human trial data for neuropathic pain spanning 28-day daily protocols. BPC-157, a pentadecapeptide derived from gastric juice protein, has extensive preclinical data for tendon, ligament, and gastrointestinal healing but limited published human trials, making dosing schedules and safety benchmarks less standardized. Both tolerate daily dosing, but ARA-290 has the stronger clinical safety profile for extended consecutive use based on published human data.
What biomarkers should be monitored during extended daily ARA-290 use?
▼
Clinical trials of daily ARA-290 monitored hemoglobin and hematocrit to confirm the peptide does not stimulate erythropoiesis despite its structural relationship to EPO, liver enzymes (AST, ALT) to detect hepatotoxicity, renal function markers (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate) to assess kidney impact, and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) to track systemic inflammation. For protocols extending beyond the 28-day benchmark established in published trials, baseline and interval (every 14 days) measurements of these biomarkers are recommended to detect subclinical changes. Endpoint-specific markers — such as neuropathic pain scores, nerve conduction velocity, or intraepidermal nerve fiber density biopsy — should also be reassessed at intervals to determine whether continued daily dosing provides incremental benefit.
Can you take ARA-290 daily if you have pre-existing kidney or liver disease?
▼
No published clinical trial of ARA-290 specifically enrolled participants with moderate-to-severe hepatic or renal impairment, so safety data in these populations are limited. The peptide is renally cleared, which theoretically increases exposure in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate, but trials monitoring renal function markers (creatinine, eGFR) during 28-day daily protocols showed no evidence of nephrotoxicity in participants with normal baseline kidney function. If considering daily ARA-290 in the context of pre-existing kidney or liver disease, baseline organ function testing and more frequent interval monitoring (every 7 days rather than every 14 days) would be prudent, and dose reduction or protocol modification may be necessary if biomarkers worsen. This decision requires consultation with a supervising physician familiar with both the peptide mechanism and the underlying organ dysfunction.
What is the difference between taking ARA-290 daily versus every other day?
▼
Daily ARA-290 dosing maintains sustained innate repair receptor (IRR) occupancy throughout the tissue injury or repair phase, which is critical for continuous anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory signaling. The peptide’s 4–6 hour serum half-life means plasma concentrations drop to baseline within 24 hours, but the downstream tissue-protective effects last 24–48 hours. Every-other-day dosing introduces a gap where receptor occupancy declines before the next dose, potentially allowing pro-inflammatory and apoptotic signaling to re-establish during the off days. Published clinical trials for neuropathic pain and acute tissue injury exclusively used consecutive daily protocols because the biological mechanism depends on sustained signaling suppression, not episodic intervention. Every-other-day schedules have not been validated in human trials and would likely reduce efficacy compared to daily dosing.
Who should not take ARA-290 daily?
▼
ARA-290 has not been studied in pregnant or breastfeeding populations, so daily use in these groups is contraindicated due to lack of safety data. Individuals with known hypersensitivity to erythropoietin-derived peptides or those who experienced anaphylactic reactions to EPO should avoid ARA-290 despite its selective IRR targeting. Patients with active malignancy should approach daily ARA-290 with caution, as the anti-apoptotic signaling pathways activated by IRR could theoretically interfere with cancer cell apoptosis, though no clinical evidence of tumor promotion has been documented. Finally, those with uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or recent thromboembolic events should consult a physician before initiating daily protocols, even though published trials showed no increase in thromboembolic risk.